Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

The Defendant is a person using the “B” in the NAV. The Defendant, within the NAV from January 18, 2017 to 23:55 from January 23:25 to 23:55, the Defendant is expected to force the Defendant to delete and withdraw the Defendant’s expression “influent an individual or insultingly speaking through 1:1 printing.”

If there is any inconvenience, however, that is, the legitimacy is repeated, but if there is any inconvenience, the management office shall follow the procedure by running the procedure.

In this context, Doz. has the right to speak for the public interest purpose.

’ 라는 글 밑에 「 냐 너는 내 눈에 띠면 끝 나 시 발, 나가라 너, 양아치 개 세끼 내 글 지워 , 넌 눈에 떼랴 개 세끼, 위아래 개뿔 양아치 세끼, 넌 개야, 양아치 개 세끼 넌 니 살던데 가라, 한 주먹 꺼리도 안돼 총무 개세 꺄, 씨발 넌 게임 안돼 소송해 볼래

ㅎㅎㅎㅎㅎㅎ , 개 세끼 총무 넌 팔고 가라 개 쎄끼」 라는 내용의 댓 글을 게재함으로써 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The defendant alleged to the effect that he denies the charges of this case (the charge of this case is found guilty in light of the facts duly adopted and examined by the court, the following facts: (a) it is acknowledged that the defendant posted the above article on the message to the victim (B) in a photograph of the closure of the message attached to the complaint; (b) the defendant is also a person who committed the above act; and (c) the NAV is a space used by many commercial occupants; and (d) the NAV on which the above article was posted is used by many commercial occupants; and (e) the public performance is recognized.) The application of the law of this case is recognized.

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;