On February 28, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to larceny, occupational embezzlement, violation of road traffic law (unlicensed driving), imprisonment with prison labor for one year and fine of 300,000 won for fraud, and completed the execution of the above imprisonment with prison labor in Daegu on December 1, 2017.

1. On March 2, 2018, the Defendant came to know of the Victim M in Daegu-gu G through Internet hosting at H on March 2, 2018, “the Defendant has the money to receive to another person.”

If 3 million won is borrowed in the middle of the vehicle, it will be repaid as soon as possible with the money.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, at the time, the Defendant was working on a daily basis, and there was no fixed income, and there was no money to receive from others, and there was no intention to receive money from the damaged party at will due to lack of living expenses, so even if he borrowed money from the damaged party, there was no intention or ability to pay the money.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was immediately given three million won in cash from the injured party.

2. On March 7, 2018, the Defendant is expected to pay the said victim a full amount by the J Bank located near the Daegu-gu I building, Daegu-gu, with the loan of the said victim for the following month.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, at the time, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay money from the damaged party, even if he borrowed money from the damaged party due to financial standing as stated in the above 1.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 6 million won in cash immediately from the injured party.

3. On April 5, 2018, the Defendant is required to reach an agreement in the L coffee shop near Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and the above victim “in the former president and the assault case, the agreement is required.

It is possible to pay the borrowed money to theponner and to marry with theponer.

The phrase “(i) lend the agreed amount.” was false.

However, at the time of fact, the defendant is in accordance with the above 1.