beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018. 07. 19. 선고 2018누43554 판결

주식회사 발기설립시 현물출자에 대한 양도시기는 주주의 지위를 취득하는 설립등기시기로 보아야 함[국승]

Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court-2017-Gu Partnership-7574 ( April 12, 2018)

Case Number of the previous trial

Appellate Court 2017J 2374 (Law No. 17, 2017)

Title

At the time of incorporation promotion, the time of transfer of contribution in kind should be regarded as the time of registration of incorporation acquisition of shareholder status.

Summary

In the event that an individual entrepreneur subject to the carried-over taxation of the transfer income tax following the conversion into a corporation disposes of not less than 50/100 of the stocks acquired by the conversion into a corporation, the time of the transfer of the stocks in kind at the time of the incorporation promotion corporation’s incorporation acquisition is the time of the registration of incorporation. Thus, the Plaintiff’s disposal of the Defendant’s disposal of the stocks transferred

Related statutes

Article 32 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act carrying forward taxation of capital gains tax following the conversion into corporation.

Cases

Seoul High Court-2018-Nu-4354 Revocation of Disposition imposing capital gains tax, etc.

Plaintiff

United StatesA

Defendant

s. Head of the tax office

Judgment of the lower court

April 12, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

July 19, 2018

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The imposition of capital gains tax of KRW 714,274,040 (including additional tax) that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on November 4, 2017 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this court's judgment is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of

2. Conclusion

Since the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is groundless.