손해배상(의)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff (Appointed) and the appointed party B, who constituted the money ordered to pay under the following Paragraph 2.
1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 12, 14, 26, 34, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 8, 14, 16, 17, 21, and 21 (including all of them; hereinafter the same shall apply), the first instance court's I hospital and K Hospital of this court, and the entire purport of the arguments.
The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) is the wife of net G (hereinafter “the deceased”) who received medical treatment from Defendant E, a medical specialist in the paper blood department belonging to the hospital operated by Defendant Educational Foundation D (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).
The designated parties B and C are the children of the deceased.
B. 1) On December 2010, the Deceased was hospitalized in the H Hospital with a high-tension voltage and treatment. On December 3, 2010, the Deceased was confirmed, and blood disease was suspected, and on December 20, 2010, the Defendant E was transferred to the Defendant Hospital. (2) On December 20, 2010, the Defendant E conducted blood test, shot wave test, and internal vision test (as of December 27, 2010), and both electronic and stratograph (PTT, January 3, 201, hereinafter referred to as “first two-story photography”), and discovered the name of the Deceased’s non-mar cells, sub-pymphym-pymalmalmalmmalm cells (hereinafter referred to as “the first two-party mobile cells”), and discovered the name of the deceased’s non-specific, sub-pymphalmalmalmnic, and found the name of the main mar-pymalmar cells.
C. On January 3, 2011, the Deceased’s treatment process and its progress 1) was conducted at the Defendant Hospital on January 2, 201 and discharged on January 22, 2011 (the “the first treatment period from December 20, 2010 when the deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital” (the “the period from January 22, 201 when the deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital”).
(2) 2) The Deceased was hospitalized in Defendant Hospital on seven occasions after the discharge as follows, and received antichemical therapy at the Defendant Hospital on seven occasions, and on a regular basis, in addition to the period of hospitalization.