게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., both types of punishment) that the court below sentenced to the Defendants (e.g., imprisonment of one year, Defendant B, C, and D: imprisonment of one year, and eight months) is too unreasonable.
2. The defendants are fully aware of the crimes and are against the defendants, and there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime. However, in light of the circumstances leading to each crime, the number of crimes and the size of profits, etc., Defendant A was sentenced to a fine in violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act around 2007; Defendant B committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime due to the crime of aiding and abetting sexual traffic, etc.; Defendant B committed the crime of this case in violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act; Defendant C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment one time, five times, and Defendant C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for one year due to special larceny on April 10, 2013; Defendant D committed some of the crimes of this case during the grace period; Defendant D was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year due to a special larceny on April 10, 2013; there is no special change in circumstances to change the sentence following the sentence of the court below; Defendant A was not subject to the motive, motive, circumstances, etc. of the Defendants’ respective criminal acts and arguments.
3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there are no grounds for appeal by the defendants. It is so decided as per Disposition.