However, with respect to Defendant E, this ruling shall be given for a period of two years from the date this ruling becomes final and conclusive.

[Criminal Records] Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Busan District Court on December 15, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 22, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On August 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the charge of selling approximately KRW 0.7gg of the Metetop (one philophone), a local mental medicine, to E, around 0.7g of approximately 4,300,00 won; (b) on December 9, 2016, Defendant A was under an investigation with E, an informant at the Busan Local Public Prosecutor’s Office, which was prosecuted and tried to have E make a false testimony when the instant case was prosecuted and tried to do so.

On December 2, 2016, the Defendant sent a letter to E at the Busan detention center located in the Busan detention center located in 268, the head of the Busan High School, "if he/she is tried within the court, he/she shall be present in the court as a witness and give testimony "no memory". On January 11, 2017, he/she was prosecuted as the above case, and then testified to E at the Busan High detention center meeting room as follows: "No memory is any memory, and even if he/she has a disability, he/she shall be unable to memory." If he/she gives testimony, he/she shall not be perjury but shall not be a crime of false accusation.

“Around April 1, 2017,” from that time, “from that time,” to that time, the testimony was requested by the E to give testimony to “no memory,” and the E had the E make a false testimony.

Ultimately, E, even though the purchase of phiphones from the Defendant, and the fact that he was investigated and tried accordingly, is memoryed, in the court of Busan District Court No. 352 at around April 4, 2017, around 15:00, and around 15:30 on May 19, 2017, the above court of Busan District Court No. 352 at around 31, 2017, was present as a witness of the violation of the Narcotics Control Act against the Defendant No. 8378 at the above court of 2016, and took an oath, and the purport that E was instigated by the Defendant.