However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the above sentence shall be executed.

"2016 Highest 1594"

1. On March 27, 2016, at around 10:50, the Defendant driven DK5 car on the front of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, a road before the Gangnam-gu Seoul, with a dangerous driving of DK5 car, such as reducing the speed of the car, or changing a sudden lane, etc., and the police officer of the Gangnam-gu Police Station Emba, who was patroled at the scene, demanded a alcohol measurement and identification card to be conducted, the Defendant Company Company’s “Ambsson’s error in this weather.”

Does he want to die this blicker

The term "the expression" and "the identification card was presented without presenting it."

Therefore, when the above F requires the defendant to leave the vehicle in front, the defendant added the F to the vehicle, and the defendant assaulted F with a dangerous vehicle, which is a dangerous object, even though he again demanded to produce an identification card, by driving about about one meter as it is.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the crackdown on drinking driving.

"2016 Highest 1599"

2. On March 28, 2016, the Defendant, on the ground that around 18:10 on March 28, 2016, the Defendant walked the paths from the Hway located in Gwangju-dong G, leaving the victim I ( South, 19 years old), and then, as the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

“Intimidating the victim”, the victim was threatened.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 Highest 1594]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A criminal investigation report (verification, etc. of evidential images without arrest site);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police interrogation protocol to I;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 144(1), 136(1) (a) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of special official duties), Articles 284 and 283(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, and each choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act 1.