However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years and six months from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The telephone financial fraud organization of the 2020 Highest 985 consists of an organization that establishes and operates a call center in an unsound place and provides false information to an unspecified number of people in the Republic of Korea and obtains money from those people (hereinafter referred to as “scaming”). It consists of “total liability” that plans and instructs a crime as a whole, “induction” that induces victims by directly speaking and speaking by telephone, and “collection measures” that receive money from victims.

On February 18, 2020, the Defendant conspiredd with the telephone financial fraud assistance staff to obtain money from many unspecified victims in order by taking the role of collecting and delivering cash from the victims while working as an employee of a financial company after receiving proposals from a financial company on the name of the Bosing organization.

At around 12:37 February 27, 2020, an employee under the name of the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy is required to transfer the amount of KRW 40 million to a claim team employee of the Korea Exchange, which is the first time to repay the amount of KRW 7 million, when misrepresenting the amount of KRW 30 million by telephone to the victim B.

“Falsely speaking, the Defendant, at around 18:45, on February 28, 2020, received KRW 6 million from the victim as if he/she was an employee of the credit team of the F Bank in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, as a result, at the D Bank reverse village branch of the D Bank in Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul. Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with the employees of the F Bank Credit Team in collusion with one’s name in order to induce the victim, thereby deceiving him/her, thereby deceiving him/her. The Defendant was not allowed to lend the means of access with the knowledge that he/she would be used for a crime or for a crime, even if he/she was aware that he/she was not able to use the means of access for the purpose of using it for the crime or to use it for the crime, the Defendant was not aware of the act of lending the means of access to him/her on February 20, 202.