2.Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

around 22:45 on February 16, 2018, the Defendant: (a) expressed the Defendant’s desire as stated in the facts charged to dismiss the prosecution; (b) Donsan D, the victim of the crime of insult, and the Defendant Donsan E, the victim of the crime of insult, tried to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the crime of insult; (c) Donsan D’s snow part of the police officer D’s eye by drinking the Defendant; (d) Donna, the victim of the injury; and (d) Donsan D’s flab, the Defendant flabed the Defendant’s flab, and flad the Defendant’s flab, and fladd the Defendant’s flab, and flad the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning criminal investigation and public security; and (d) interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties by committing assaulting the victim’s fla

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to D, E, and F;

1. Registers of medical treatment and certificates of medical treatment;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence is that the defendant assaulted police officers in the course of performing official duties, and the defendant needs to be punished corresponding thereto.

However, considering that the defendant agreed with police officers, the defendant shall be placed in the line only once in consideration of the degree of violence and criminal punishment, the age, sexual conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. On February 16, 2018, the Defendant: (a) in a singing practice place located in Dasan-si B on February 16, 2018, for the following reasons: (b) the Defendant: (c) was unable to ask questions about the developments of the assault from the G District at the Donsan Police Station G G District D; and (d) the Defendant’s employees, etc. among the victims of the said singing practice place, on the ground that: (a) he was sent to the victim after having received a report 112; and (b) was bad; (b) the Defendant

1.2.2