2. The lower court, under the circumstances favorable to the Defendant’s confession and rebuttal, committed a crime, committed several times in favor of the agreement with the victim, took into account the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, and the fact that the Defendant committed another crime during the period of repeated crime, and determined the sentence of punishment in consideration of various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

The reason for the improper sentencing (a serious nature of violent crimes, criminal records, repeated crimes, etc.) alleged by the prosecutor is shown to have been sufficiently considered in determining the sentence against the defendant, and the above conditions of the sentencing changed otherwise.

There is no circumstance to see the above sentencing conditions, and considering the above sentencing conditions, the sentence of the court below is determined to be reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion.

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.