However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

As Defendant A did not receive money from the victim C’s children, the Defendants conspired to steal the victim’s residence.

At around 01:25 on October 10, 2020, the Defendants came to front of the victim’s residence gate located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and Defendant A her seated above the above pents, and Defendant B her seated with a net in front of the above pents. Defendant B her seated above the above pents, and Defendant B her own 1,50,000 at the market price of the victim’s ownership.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of the relevant photographs, records of seizure and the statutes of the seizure list;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1248, Apr. 1, 2008; 200Da14488, Feb. 29, 200; 208Da1488, Feb. 29, 2009)