2. The crime of this case is an unfavorable circumstance to the Defendant, in light of the following: (a) the crime of this case requires severe social harm and punishment; (b) the Defendant collected cash from the victims and delivered them to his accomplices; and (c) the degree of his participation is not easy; (d) the Defendant divided a large percentage of criminal proceeds into divided parts; and (e) the Defendant was unable to receive a letter from the victims and did not recover from the victims.

On the other hand, some of the crimes are favorable to the defendant, such as attempted crimes.

In addition, the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable on the grounds that the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, motive and background of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.