Of the facts charged in the instant case, the victim C is a victim C on February 16, 2017, and February 1, 2017.

The Defendant “2018 Godan 254- Defendant A” is required to purchase the E frequency of internal and external E in the D Hospital located in the south-gu, Yanan-si on June 20, 2016 to the victim C.

On October 2017, a false statement was made that a person would repay the money by lending money.

However, in fact, the Defendant had no special profits due to the difficulties in running the frequency collection business at the time. However, even though the Defendant had operated the number system, the Plaintiff failed to pay the amount by borrowing money from the financial institution, and failed to operate the normal system by appropriating the amount of money from the financial institution. The Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the amount even if he borrowed the money from the damaged party due to the total amount of the debt.

The Defendant received 20 million won from the injured party to the F account in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and received from August 31, 2016 the sum of eight times from the time of the transfer to August 31, 2016, 85.1 million won in total, from the time of the transfer to August 31, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

The Defendant of Boan-Ma 268- Defendant A, on October 13, 2014, intends to borrow money from the Defendant’s management of the G located in Boan-si around 2014 to the victim I and receive three copies of the interest and receive five copies of the interest and return the principal to the person who lent the money on May 21, 2015.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any particular property or income, while the Defendant committed a debt in several million won, and was unable to pay a credit normally to the members of the number fraternity in operation, and there is a very difficult economic situation. Therefore, even if he borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay the credit.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and is on the same day from the victim.