1. In full consideration of all the circumstances indicated in the records, such as the age, occupation, and criminal record and the type, motive, criminal process, result, etc. of the Defendant and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”), it is justifiable to maintain the judgment of the first instance court ordering the disclosure of personal information for a period of three years, even if considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, and there is no error as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment regarding the claim for attachment order, in light of the records, the lower court, based on its stated reasoning, risk of recidivism by the Defendant.

The judgment of the court of first instance ordering the attachment of an electronic tracking device for a period of three years is just, and there is no error as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.