Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On March 16, 2020, around 13:13, 2020, the Defendant assaulted the victim by entering the above ice with the Defendant’s damage, and sprinking the franchis of the victim, on the ground that the victim D (ma, South and 61 years old) used the above TPPM machine for long time within the strings.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. An order of provisional payment is not suitable for committing a crime with reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, but is not prepared by the victim, and the fact that the defendant had been able to have the same power in the past is disadvantageous.

However, in light of the circumstances of the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into consideration various factors of sentencing as shown in the arguments in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., which are contingent crimes, the defendant recognized the facts of the crime, the fact that there was no record of the crime for the last five years, the defendant has difficulty in economic appearance as a beneficiary