beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.06.22 2017고단1669

사문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, consent to and confirmation of the use of the vehicle against the Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment due to fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Child Training Correctional Institution on April 15, 2015.

"2017 Highest 1669"

1. On January 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stated that “The name of the vehicle: HG, vehicle number E, and the name of the owner: (b)” in the written consent of the insurance with the sign of an obstacle to the name of the person in need of the name, “The name of the vehicle: HG, vehicle number E, and the name of the owner: (c)” and entered “F” in the vehicle owner’s name column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising rights and obligations, the Defendant forged a written consent to the purchase of insurance in the name of the F Bank of Korea.

2. The Defendant exercised the said investigation document as if he were a document duly formed with a written consent to the insurance subscription in the name of the F in the name of the Bank of Bank in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, as set forth in paragraph (1), to G who was aware of the forgery in front of the building Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

"2017 Highest 3010"

1. In the case of a vehicle in circulation with H and a large-type vehicle, the Defendant: (a) used the owner’s seal impression certificate and the vehicle waiver in his/her name; and (b) offered a normally high-class vehicle as a security by the borrower; (c) offered a high-ranking vehicle; and (d) offered a public offering to obtain an investment in money under the name of the principal of the loan and to obtain money from the borrower; and (c) offered a high-ranking vehicle by means of the Internet car page to obtain money in the name of the principal of the loan.

Security 100%, principal security 100%, domestic teas, import teas and sales, and loaned as security will guarantee more profits than those of the general workers.

A notice posted an advertisement to the effect that “......”

After January 6, 2016, the Defendant and H reported and contacted the above advertising at the J coffee shop located in Ansan-si and H. The victim reported the above advertising.