A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Defendant

A was a person who operated G in the city of Gwangju, and Defendant B was a representative director, investor, and employee in the name of Sung-nam-si H in the name of Sung-gu H in Seoul-si H, J (one name K), L (one name M), P, R (one name Q), T (one name U), X (one name T), Z, Z, AAB, AB, AC, and AD. In the case of "banking financial resources loan" handled at 17 banks in the city of Gwangju, the above J concluded a loan agreement with the bank itself in order to guarantee the extent of 80% of the above loan from the "Korea Housing Finance Corporation" and concluded a false loan agreement with the owner of the said bank, and entered into a false loan agreement with the Z as if the loan procedures were to obtain the aforementioned loan agreement from the owner of the said bank, and made a false loan agreement with the owner of the said company to enter into a false loan agreement with the Z, and made it possible for the Z to file an application for the aforementioned loan agreement with the Z.

Defendant A, who operated G, did not actually work for the company, was in the role of manipulating loan-related documents, such as a certificate of employment, as if the customer actually worked for the company operated by the Defendant, and Defendant B, as if the customer actually worked for the company as the actual operator of the above I, did not actually work for the company, but as if the customer were in the above I, he would like to manipulate the loan-related documents, such as a certificate of employment, as if the customer actually worked for the company, and the J (one person K) would inquire into the limit of the loan if the officer is in the presence