공장설립등의승인취소처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
(10) On January 12, 2012, the Plaintiff: ① 614, 614-2, 614-3, 614-3, ② 2 factory development on the land 614-3, 3 factory development on the land 614-3, 614-4, 614-4, 614-4, 616-164, 66-16-1, 64, 66-164, 67, 64-16, 64, 64-16, 64, 664, 66-16, 64, 64, 66-16, 64, 64, 66-16, 64, 664, 64, 64-16, 64, and 64, respectively.
B. On March 6, 2015, the Defendant revoked the instant approval of factory construction (hereinafter “instant disposition”) pursuant to subparagraph 1 of Article 13-5 of the Industrial Cluster Development and Factory Establishment Act (hereinafter “Industrial Cluster Act”) on the ground that “the Plaintiff did not commence a factory by the date on which three years elapsed after obtaining approval for the establishment, etc. of a factory.”
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 4 and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The Plaintiff asserted on March 2, 201, before obtaining the instant approval for establishment, concluded a contract for civil engineering works on the instant site with the Open Land Co., Ltd., and the Heat Land Co., Ltd started the civil engineering works on the instant site from April 2011.
Although construction costs are under way, they are.