2. According to the records, the court below's sentencing is reasonable in light of the following circumstances: (a) the defendant led to a confession and reflect on the crime; (b) the victim was unable to punish the defendant by agreement with the victim; and (c) the defendant was committed together with the victims; and (d) the defendant could have been included in part of the amount of damage; (d) the defendant was sentenced to a fine of the same kind; (e) four times before and after the suspension of execution; and (d) one time before and after the suspension of execution; and (e) one time after the sentence; (e) the contents of the crime are very similar to the applicable criminal law; (e) the crime committed without being aware of the repeated crime during the period of the repeated crime; (e) the total amount of damage was the larger amount than 69 million won; (e) the method of deception was very active and intentional; and (e) the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment; and (e) other circumstances after the crime.

3. In conclusion, since the prosecutor's and the defendant's arguments are without merit, all appeals by the prosecutor and the defendant are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.