beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.12.17 2015가합203763

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Defendant Republic of Korea: (a) KRW 9,918,981; (b) KRW 1,00,000; and (c) each of the said money to Plaintiff A on February 15, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From around 17:40 on February 15, 2014, Plaintiff A: (a) opened a window from 601 to 601 on the 5th floor of 17:40, in Daegu Seo-gu, Seo-gu (hereinafter “the instant telecom”); and (b) sounded, “I will die without the J.” (hereinafter “the instant telecom”); (c) the J, who arrived at the site around 18:40, attempted to communicate with the said Plaintiff, he fell to the top in a set of watch installed on the third floor rail; (d) around 18:50 on the same day, Defendant C, D, E, etc., who was a K in the 119 first responder and the Seo-gu Seo-gu Police Station, was sent to the emergency room of a movable hospital.

(A) Evidence 13, 26, A No. 14.b.

Since then, police officers requested the plaintiff A to take the criminal department office of the Seocho Police Station in the form of voluntary movement of the plaintiff who was unable to walk in the above movable property hospital. At the time, the police officer argued that the J was to put his/her pedalopon into his/her balopon to his/her balopon. At that time, the plaintiff A argued that the J was to put the balopon into his/her balopon.

(A) No. 7 13,26). (c)

Since then, the police officers in charge received the above plaintiff's urine by voluntarily submitting the plaintiff's urine in the presence of L, etc. which is the part of the plaintiff A, and inspected it, but did not have any response to the reagents.

Therefore, although the above plaintiff demanded that the police officer in charge send them to the house because he did not have any reaction, the police officer in charge requested that the above plaintiff be sent to the house, and that the police officer in charge again requested that the above plaintiff be sent to another place for inspection.

(A) No. 7 13,26) d.

One of the police officers in charge after diving brought a place in another office, and re-examine a documentaryman's inspection on the above urine, and the response to the training of phiphones was caused by the above prosecutor, and the police officers in charge immediately arrested the plaintiff A and arrested the plaintiff A.

(A) Evidence No. 7 13,26). e.

Plaintiff

A was admitted to the Presidential Police Station at around 22:40 on February 15, 2014, and the Presidential Police Station at around 22:40, and the above police station, such as Defendant F and G.