If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On November 29, 2014, the Defendant was requested from F, a police officer belonging to the above C Zone, who was called up after the Defendant, who was a passenger, spiting and spiting in the E-cab of D driving, around the Hanju Police Station C District at Won-si, on November 29, 2014. On the other hand, the Defendant saw the above police officer to have governance, “I want to do so, I want to see the above police officer’s status, and continuously requested the above police officer to stop her home, and recommended the above police officer to stop her home, and she saw the above police officer to have her home.” The Defendant saw the above police officer to have her walked, died, and her home. The Defendant she sawed the above police officer’s right side of the port, such as “Iskbbbbbing, Is, Isk and she see.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning protective measures against a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the order of provisional payment [fluorous circumstances] lack criminal records, and the fact that the crime is not good for committing an obstruction of performance of official duties against police officers, who committed serious reflects [fluoral circumstances]