손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 5 million and its relation to the Plaintiff shall be 5% per annum from September 19, 2019 to May 26, 2020.
1. The plaintiff's assertion
A. The Defendant committed rape against the Plaintiff on January 2013 in the vicinity of the casino of a regular vessel, rape in the column of the city owned by the Defendant at night on January 2014, rape in the middle and second night, rape in the mutual influence village of the Defendant at night on November 2014, rape in the room where the Plaintiff’s children were born during September 2015, rape in the Plaintiff’s room on May 21, 2016, rape in the bus stops near the Plaintiff’s home around October 21, 2017, rape in the bus stops near the Myeon Office around December 2017, and rape in the Cel of the Myeon Office around July 10:30, 2018, and rape in D at around July 30, 2018.
B. On December 2013, at around 07:00, the Defendant committed indecent act by compulsion on the side of an expressway located in Gangwon-do, by compulsion on the part of the expressway, around 9:00 on May 29, 2017, by indecent act on the E apartment located in Chungcheongju on May 29, 2018, by indecent act on the part of the deceased, around 20:0, around 20:0, around 20:0, the Defendant committed indecent act by compulsion on the part of the street located around the Busan-si Parking Site, and around 21:0 on December 21, 2018.
C. On July 15, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the Plaintiff at around 15:00, and destroyed the vehicle owned by the Plaintiff at around 14:00 on September 14, 2018, and threatened the Plaintiff at around 22:00 on December 18, 2018.
The plaintiff suffered damages of KRW 7,789,281, automobile repair expenses of KRW 867,152, consolation money of KRW 50 million due to rape committed by the defendant.
2. Determination
A. According to the purport of the oral argument, the Plaintiff’s application for adjudication on rape and indecent act by compulsion against the Defendant was dismissed on August 14, 2019 (Seoul High Court 2019 early April 14, 2019). The Plaintiff brought about the teaching system and sexual intercourse with the Defendant from around 2014 to around 2018, and the Plaintiff resumed with another female on December 8, 2018, and the Plaintiff appears to have been pro rata or proneed, and there was no statement by the Defendant on the record of the record submitted by the Plaintiff that the Defendant appeared to have been rape or indecent act by compulsion.