전자금융거래법위반등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, and 80 hours of community service) is too unreasonable.
2. There are no circumstances that may be considered favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, and that the defendant agreed smoothly with some victims of the crime of embezzlement of this case.
However, the access media transferred by the defendant had been used for other frauds, and the defendant voluntarily withdrawn the money deposited into the above account due to the frauds. The above argument by the defendant is without merit, since it is too excessive punishment imposed by the court below on the defendant, and it is not unfair because it is too unreasonable, considering all the sentencing conditions of the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, circumstances of each crime of this case, and circumstances before and after the crime.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.