However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 21, 2016, around 03:55, the Defendant, in front of Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D on May 21, 2016, viewed the first victim E (22 taxes) and the victim’s daily behaviors on the day of the instant case.

During the victim's participation in alcohol, the victim's speech that "the bridge is a bridge, which is likely to be a bridge," and that "the bridge is likely to be a bridge, which is likely to be a bridge," and that the victim expressed a bridge to the defendant, and that the victim purchased the boom and the block, which is a dangerous object, at the near convenience store.

Defendant 1 got off the victim's bridge in the state where he was in his hand, and her face was taken back by drinking the victim's face. Defendant 1 ran out the victim's face, she laid off the victim's left side by drinking it, she gets back the victim's face in the state where the victim's knife knife knife knife knife knife knifes.

The Defendant carried dangerous articles as above and inflicted injury on the victim, such as a ductal, in need of treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. A survey report (case on the analysis ofCCTV images);

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the full agreement with the victim, the full agreement between the victim and the opening of the past, etc.);