가. 갑 1~10(각 가지번호 포함)의 각 일부 기재에 변론 전체의 취지를 더하면, 원고가 내세우는 피고들에 대한 이 사건 각각의 청구원인사실(☞ 별지 <청구원인> 중 해당 부분 참조)을 모두 인정할 수 있으므로, 특별한 사정이 없는 한 피고들은 원고에게 주문 제1항의 해당 부분에 나오는 각각의 건물 부분을 인도할 의무가 있다.

B. As to this, the defendants cannot respond to the plaintiff's request for delivery of each of the buildings of this case before receiving reasonable compensation for losses in the amount of at least 58 million won, because the amount of business compensation set to them is too small.

(B) Although the Defendants asserted to the purport that “the time during which they may move to the Republic of Korea” was changed, such circumstances cannot be a justifiable ground for preventing the Plaintiff from requesting the delivery of each of the instant building against the Defendants, and thus, the Defendants’ internal taxes cannot be accepted either in any of the above arguments or in all.

2. According to the conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim for the delivery of each of the instant buildings against the Defendants seeking the performance of each of the obligations recognized as above is accepted.