However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On January 29, 2013, at around 15:00, the Defendant appealed that he was punished by the previous obstruction of performance of official duties in front of the Guro-gu Seoul District District, and that “I am scare, I am scare, I am scare, I am scare, I am scare, I am scare, I am am snae, I am am snae, I am am snae, I am snae, I am snae, I am snae I am.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act [Determination of Punishment] : Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties / Forced Performance of Duties - Where the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor: [Determination of the recommended area] mitigated area / [Determination of the recommendation area] 1 to 8 months / [Prohibition of Suspension of Execution / Where the degree of positive assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor: In a case where the degree of positive assault, threat, and deceptive scheme is minor: there is no criminal record above positive social relation: there is no criminal record of the suspension of execution / there is no positive social relation (decision of sentence / The defendant committed the crime of this case under the influence of alcohol and has been sentenced to a fine for a crime similar to several times, and the possibility of recidivism shall