임대차보증금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 40 million and the Plaintiff’s annual rate from July 6, 2019 to October 4, 2019, and the following.
1. As to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff leased the Real Estate C and D (hereinafter “instant Real Estate”) from the Defendant on May 10, 2017 by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 40 million, the lease term from May 13, 2017 to May 12, 2019, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that he/she had no intention to renew the lease term of the instant Real Estate one month prior to the expiration of the lease term; the fact that the Plaintiff delivered the instant Real Estate to the Defendant on July 5, 2019 that he/she delivered the instant Real Estate to the Defendant on or around July 5, 2019 may be recognized by comprehensively taking into account no dispute between the parties or all the entries and arguments in subparagraphs A and 4.
According to the above facts, since the lease relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant with respect to the real estate of this case terminated by the Do on May 12, 2019, the expiration date of the lease deposit, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff damages for delay calculated by the rate of 40 million won per annum under the Civil Act from July 6, 2019 to October 4, 2019, the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case, from July 6, 2019 to October 4, 2019, and 12% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment.
2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.