2. The lower court determined that: (a) under the favorable circumstances for the Defendant, the Defendant’s mistake is divided in depth and reflects the Defendant’s mistake; (b) the Defendant surrenders himself; (c) the Defendant appears to have to live a life within the charge of committing the crime that he kills the most love and intended children; (d) the husband of the Defendant, who is the bereaved family member, complains of the Defendant’s wife without wanting to punish the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant wishes to take the Defendant’s wife against other families; (b) the Defendant is a primary offender; (c) under the unfavorable circumstances against the Defendant; (d) the life of a person is a small and absolute value that cannot change what he is, and thus, it is considerably difficult for the Defendant to protect the Defendant’s life as well as the State’s best value; and (d) the victim’s awareness is an independent body independent of his mother, and rather, it is difficult for the victim to look at his responsibility to see his own life and body, and the victim’s life cannot be easily punished for six months after his life.

The sentencing of the lower court is as above.