except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 22, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 12:30 on the Cheongju-si, Seowon-gu, Seowon-gu, the construction site manager of the construction site, and (b) on the ground that the victim C, who was the construction site manager of the building site, failed to properly install safety facilities, etc., was able to enter the construction site where only one vehicle can be allowed to enter; and (c) during about 47 minutes repeatedly, the Defendant was unable to enter the 8 price of

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the construction of officetels by force of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of the case, a report on the 112 reported case processing table, an investigation report (Attachment of photographs to the closures of an officetel construction site), and an investigation report (report attached to photographs related to the suspected facts).

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment, and imprisonment (two times the same electricity for the same victim);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that a victim is not subject to punishment under an agreement, etc.);