However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 17, 2015, at around 03:30, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault by the Defendant in front of the Cnobya-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si; (b) the circumstances surrounding the D District Unit of the Seocheon-gu Police Station D District, which was called after receiving the report of 112 report that there was a fare for the use of the fee; and (c) the Defendant completed the process of handling the report; and (d) the Defendant was to board the patrol vehicle and to depart from the patrol vehicle; (d) the Defendant opened the patrol team; and (e) the Defendant was unable to depart from the patrol vehicle, and (e) the said E used the Defendant as a defect that was pushed the out of the patrol vehicle, and (e) the Defendant’s knished the said E’s losses beyond the floor of the Anoby-man.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to crime prevention, suppression and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement statement made to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties. [Determination of sentence] favorable circumstances: The defendant confessions the crime of this case, appears to have been divided into his mistake, the victim seems to have been seriously punished, and the defendant still has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime: Unfavorable circumstances such as the defendant's use of violence to police officers dispatched due to his mistake, and the nature of the crime is not good, and the degree of interference with official duties due to the assault of this case and other circumstances under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the degree of interference with official duties, shall be determined as ordered within the scope of the sentencing guidelines.