On December 19, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment due to assault or bodily injury at the Jeonju District Court in Gwangju High Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on May 11, 2009.

1. Forgery of public documents and the uttering of forged public documents;

A. On July 201, the Defendant forged a copy of C’s resident registration certificate by reproducing C’s resident registration certificate in front of, and back to, one side of the road in order to use the opening of a mobile phone at a place where it is difficult to know at or below the end of the pertinent time, and then reproducing C’s resident registration certificate by attaching a photograph of the Defendant to the photograph column of the copy of the resident registration certificate.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of C’s resident registration certificate, which is an official document, of a optical market.

B. On July 18, 2011, the Defendant presented a forged copy of the resident registration certificate to the said D employee, who opened a mobile phone and could not know his/her name that he/she was forged, and exercised it as if he/she were issued a genuine copy of the forged resident registration certificate.

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On July 18, 2011, the Defendant, at the D Office of Macheon-si, prepared an application for mobile phone entry in order to open a mobile phone in the name of C, entered “C”, “F”, “C”, and “C”, respectively, in the column of the mobile phone sales contract, and entered “C” in the column of the address in the column of address.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a written application for joining a mobile phone in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant above A.

At the same time, at the same time and place as the same as the paragraph, a copy of the forged mobile phone membership application was delivered to the person who was unaware of the forgery and exercised it as if it were duly formed.

3. The Defendant’s fraud is as follows: D. around July 18, 201.