If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On September 22, 2012, the Defendant is the owner of the vehicle B, and the owner of the vehicle is prohibited from operating the vehicle on the road that was not covered by mandatory insurance, but operated the said vehicle on September 22, 2012 at the entrance road of the Dagwon Dagwon, such as the Dogwon, Sejong Metropolitan City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about non-insurance operating vehicles;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation and the main sentence of Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Act on the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing of the instant case is the case concerning the operation of an uninsurance vehicle conducted before notification of summary order on October 15, 2012 by the Defendant for operating an uninsurance vehicle, which was the case concerning the operation of an uninsurance vehicle conducted before notification of summary order on October 15, 2012 (the criminal facts of summary order are in substantive concurrent relations with the criminal facts of summary order) and shall be determined as per the order.