If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On September 16, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would use raw ginseng in the company run by it, and pay the price to the victim E by September 19, 2012,” at the Dok-gun Dak National Agricultural Cooperative (CFC) Daknam-gun, Geumnam-gun, Kim Jong-gun.”

However, the defendant did not use the above raw ginseng in the company, but did not have the intention or ability to pay the raw ginseng price.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, obtained pecuniary benefits from raw ginseng equivalent to KRW 22,669,50,00 from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of each police suspect examination protocol against the accused;

1. Application of each police statement statute to E and F;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant had been already punished for the same kind of crime under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, despite the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case, and the amount of damage caused by this case is a large amount, the defendant should be punished strictly. However, the defendant should be determined as ordered by taking into account the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and other factors of sentencing indicated in the record, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct