beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.04.12 2013고단535

업무방해

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are those who are engaged in cargo vehicle driving, and Defendant A is the members of the DEU EF, Defendant C, and Defendant B are non-members.

From June 25, 2012, the E-Trade demanded an increase in transportation charges, and the Defendants conspired to increase the participation rate in the E-Trade and maximize the effect of the strike, and to interfere with the transportation of cargo drivers who do not participate in the strike.

On June 27, 2012, at around 10:30 on June 27, 2012, eight members of the E-Trade Union including the Defendants were returning to the Jeonsung-gun, Jeonsung-gun, a F-authorized car, and the victim H was found to perform the work of transferring the cargo lane from the victim J from the international cargo vehicle in front of the G Village in the same military, and the Defendants expressed their forces to the landed victims, and expressed “I will leave the vehicle to the E-Trade, if you will leave the vehicle, and if you will leave the vehicle promptly, you will leave the vehicle.” Defendant A will load the cargo vehicle loaded by the victimJ, Defendant C will take the cargo number plate of the victim with the victim, and Defendant C will combine the vehicle attitude with B.

Since then, through the loading of approximately KRW 1,000 out of 16,000, which was loaded in the above cargo vehicle, the weight was not checked, and it was accumulated into the floor.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the victims' turfage and cargo transport services by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Some statements concerning L, M, N,O, or P, each police suspect examination protocol;

1. Each police statement on H, J, Q and R;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (on-site exit);

1. The confessions under Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, the reflectivity, the fact that there is no criminal record for the same kind of crime, and the scale of the victims' damage.