성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, along with X, recruited female employees to engage in commercial sex acts with the trade name of “Y”, and recruited to engage in commercial sex acts, and X agreed to lease three officetels AB (AB, “AC”), AD (AD, one name “AE”), AF (AF, one name “AF,” and one name “AG”), and published commercial sex acts advertisements in the “AH,” etc., and the Defendant agreed to provide interpretation and management of female employees of Russ in the above officetel and receive half of business profits.
As the Defendant recruited as above with X, on June 21, 2016, the police officers AI who visited the said “Y” entertainment business establishment by pretending to be customers around 19:30,000, in return for sexual traffic, received KRW 180,000 won from the police officers, and paid KRW 80,000 among them to female employees AB (hereinafter “AC”), and then, the Defendant, from around May 2, 2016 to June 21, 2016, by providing guidance to the said female employees as AAB Dong 1112, allowing them to engage in sexual intercourse.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Copy of the protocol concerning suspect examination of X-type by the prosecution;
1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;
1. Investigation report (the analysis of personal phones);
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to advertising pictures for sexual traffic;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Selective Commercial Sex Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal facts, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;
1. In light of the circumstances, such as the fact that an advertisement was placed on the Internet sex trafficking brokerage advertising site for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the fact that the Defendant recognized the crime and reflects the fact that the Defendant had no record of the same punishment, etc., the circumstances in favor of the Defendant should be considered.