1. On August 19, 2017, the Defendant attempted to engage in physical fighting with the Defendant’s each type E and scambling 505, which had been administered simultaneously at the Doel 505 located in Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si on August 19, 2017, and, upon receiving 112 report, the police officers belonging to the former North Gun Police Station F Station at the North Gun Police Station at the her port, called “the fights occurred at the her port” did not commit attempted to impair the utility of the Defendant by putting him/her a scambling credit antenna installed at the lower left side of the G patrol, parked by the police officers outside the above her port, but did not cause any damage to the said antenna to the extent that the repair is necessary.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph, reported that the Defendant was to display the patrol car antenna, and that the assistant assistant H affiliated with the above patrol box committed an assault by assaulting the Defendant at the right hand, i.e., one time at the right hand, with the rear part of the said slope H, and going to the patrol car, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the report of 112 cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I and H;

1. Written statements prepared by the J;

1. Application of statutes, such as Defendant’s photograph

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 143 and 141(1) of the Criminal Act (the attempted attempted damage to goods for public use) of the choice of punishment, Article 136 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes, and the following circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, criminal conduct, career, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively taken into account and determined as the sentence as ordered.

[Unfavorable Conditions] The Defendant is under suspension of execution due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking).