beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.13 2017고단2646

강제추행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 02:05 on August 20, 2016, the Defendant was aware of the trade name “C” located in Seopopopo City B, Seopopo City, Seopopopo City, and was drinking alcoholic beverages together with other guests D (Inn, 26 years of age, name). Around drinking, the Defendant made a proposal that the above victim would be responsible for the amount of the damages, along with the victim, he was able to pay the amount of the damages. In doing so, the Defendant tried to bring the victim to the victim on his own while stating, “I will come back with the male-friendly wind, Ikna, Ikna,” but the victim tried to get back, thereby preventing the victim from taking the part of the shoulder of the victim as his hand, and then put the victim into the victim's breath in the breath of the victim, making it possible to bring the victim into the victim into the breath of the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed indecent act against the victim by assault.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Although the Defendant denies the charges, as acknowledged by the evidence, the Defendant first seeks to keep the victim in custody, as well as to keep the Defendant in custody.

No. 50

It is true that the defendant and the victim were drinking in the drinking place. ② At the time, both the defendant and the victim were drinking alcohol to a certain extent, ③ The victim was a member of the company accompanying the company such as F, the defendant's daily behaviors in the drinking place, and the victim exchanged F, and the personal information with F, and thus it is not possible to find out the reason to gather the defendant due to the falsehood. ④ Since the victim expressed off off the conversations with male-gu and reported it after the case, the victim made a report to the male-child group.