The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of defamation crimes and the crime of violation of Article 74(1)1 of the Certified Judicial Scriveners Act, and the grounds for the exclusion of illegality

Although the Defendant asserts that there was a violation of the rules of evidence, mistake of facts, or misapprehension of the legal principle on the embezzlement part of the judgment below, the Defendant asserted that the Defendant was only after the lapse of the period for filing the grounds of appeal, and that the lower court was not subject to judgment ex officio, and thus,

Furthermore, even if examining the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.