Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

1. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On July 11, 2012, the Defendant forged a letter of proxy for the certification of a seal imprint and the uttering of a falsified private document under C’s name, which is a private document related to rights and duties, with a seal imprint affixed to C’s seal imprint affixed on the letter of proxy in the above community service center without authority for the purpose of exercising, notwithstanding the fact that C was not authorized to issue a certificate of a seal imprint, the Defendant, without authority, stated “guarantee” in the letter of proxy for the purpose of use, “B” in the column for delegation, “C” in the delegating column, and “D” in the resident registration number column. The Defendant forged a letter of proxy for the certificate of a seal imprint in the name of C, which is a private document related to rights and duties by affixing the certificate of a seal imprint affixed on the name and affixed the certificate of a seal imprint affixed to the public official in charge of the 7-dong community service center in the above form, and exercised the certificate by issuing

B. On July 11, 2012, the Defendant: (a) indicated the forgery of private document of loan and the uttering of the above investigation document in the Dosan-dong, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; (b) without authority to exercise a guarantee in connection with the Defendant’s monetary loan; (c) made an promise to pay as of August 11, 201, 200, “I will pay as of August 201, 201,” and “I will pay as of August 11, 2012, 60,000, first interest of August 11, 2012; (d) indicated “C” as the guarantor, and affixed the seal imprint of the name C in custody following the name C; and (d) under the name of C, C, a private document with respect to the rights and obligations, forged the certificate of borrowing with the signature affixed by the surety; and (e) exercised the true certificate under the name of the surety by borrowing the money from E without knowledge of such forgery.

2. Fraud;

A. The Defendant on June 11, 2012