When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 22, 2016, around 04:45, the Defendant:109-16, as the superintendent of the Seo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, and the Defendant: (a) laid off a C-si operated by the injured party B (58 years old) on the street in front of the new-gu So-young apartment; and (b) laid off the C-si and called the “Masan Station”.

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the taxi fee to the victim.

The Defendant, as above, arrived in front of the E in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the purpose of which is to deceiving the victim, and thereafter, acquired property benefits equivalent to the same amount as the Plaintiff did not pay 41,400 won to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to B

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;