여신전문금융업법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
The reason for appeal by the defendant is that the original sentence is too heavy.
However, the lower court’s sentencing is not deemed unfair in light of the circumstances revealed in the grounds of sentencing and the conditions of sentencing indicated in the record.
Article 70 (2) 2 (a) of the former Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business (amended by Act No. 13068, Jan. 20, 2015); Article 70 (3) 2 (a) of the Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business (amended by Act No. 13068, Feb. 1, 2015; hereinafter “Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business”); Article 70 (3) 2 (a) of the Act on Special Credit Financial Business (amended by Act No. 13068, Jul. 20, 2015; hereinafter “Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business”); and Article 70 (3) 2 (a) of the Act on Special Credit Financial Business (amended by Act No. 13068, Jul. 21, 2015; hereinafter “Act on Special Credit Financial Business”) is obvious that the Defendant’s appeal is a clerical error in the name of the court).