except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant’s attachment D died on April 2, 1987, and thereafter, the Defendant’s mother-child died on August 18, 2002, and thereafter, the Defendant’s mother-child died in F, G, H (Death on June 3, 2012) and the Defendant’s heir respectively, and the Defendant was entitled to inheritance by share as to F, G, H, H (Death on June 3, 2012), and the 367 square meters in the name of the attached D, the 1,486 square meters in J-gun, the 1,486 square meters in size, and the 631 square meters in K prior to K (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

H Around December 2, 2009, when being used in brain bordering and being hospitalized, F, G, the Defendant, and H’s wife L sold the above I to 367 square meters and above-ground buildings and agreed to cover H’s medical expenses. On February 3, 2010, the Defendant received from L a certificate of personal seal impression and a certificate of personal seal impression from L for delegation of the conclusion of the above real estate transaction contract.

As above, the Defendant had the H’s certificate of seal impression and seal imprint, unlike the contents of consultation, had a mind to divide the instant real estate into the inherited property under the Defendant’s sole name.

1. On February 4, 2010, the Defendant, who forged a private document or display a falsified investigation document, shall consult about the inheritance commenced due to the death of D on April 2, 1987 in the letter of agreement on the division of inherited property for the purpose of exercising the inheritance by the office of the office of the office of the Macheon-gun, Macheon-gun, the Macheon-gun, the Macheon-gun, the Macheon-gun, and the co-inheritors F, G, H,

“.” The heir stated H’s name, resident registration number, and address in the heir’s column, and affixed H’s seal imprint seal imprint, thereby forging one copy of H’s letter of agreement on the division of inherited property in the name of H, which is a private document regarding rights and obligations, and, on the same day, the Cheongju District Court’s office and registry office issued a forged letter of agreement on division of inherited property as if it were a document duly formed.

2. On February 4, 2012, the Defendant: (a) false entry in the authentic copy of a notarial deed; and (b) the fact at the Cheongju District Court in the Cheongcheon Registry in the same Eup area is that H is the Defendant’s inherited property.