A. misunderstanding of facts1) (1) The Defendant had the face of the victim C at one time as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the original judgment. However, the Defendant did not agree with the victim C by leading the victim C to an underground parking lot and walking it to a drinking by drinking. Thus, it cannot be recognized that the result of injury, such as a cage cage cage cage, etc. (2) (2) (2) the Defendant did not have any fact of possessing a fage as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the original judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in light of the fact that there is an uneasiness, such as coercion of unreasonable sentencing, etc.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged in the lower court’s determination of the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts are: (a) the victim C and F have consistently stated the facts of injury as stated in each of the facts stated in the judgment of the lower court from the investigative agency to the court of the lower court; and (b) the victim C and F have consistently stated the victim C and the victim C’s injury diagnosis statement prepared on the day of the instant crime to the court of the lower court; and (c) the victim C’s injury diagnosis statement “Evidence” column contains serious pain and respiratory distress; (b) a serious pain and pulmonon on the left-hand side; (c) a serious pain and pulmonon disorder on the left-hand side; and (d) the front side of the front side of the back, the right side, the pressure, and the pain; and (e) the parts and degree of such injury correspond to the victim C’s statement and degree; and (c) the Defendant has made the victim’s injury and each of the Defendant’s injury as stated in the judgment of the lower court.

B. The victim C agrees with the defendant and revokes the complaint against the defendant, and the victim F.