beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.04.09 2014고단4932

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 18, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won as a violation of the Road Traffic Act by the Gwangju District Court on June 18, 2013, and was sentenced to a fine of two million won by the same court on January 16, 2009.

1. On October 4, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases”) driven a rocketing vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.152% and driven a two-lane of the two-lanes between the two-lanes in front of a farm located in Gwangju Seo-gu, Seo-gu, by driving a DNA farm with a alcohol alcohol concentration of 0.152%.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to ascertain the safety of course and prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering direction and brake system.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol while proceeding as is, due to occupational negligence, who did not properly see the front side of the rocketing vehicle, and received a part behind the right side of the victim E (the age of 48) driving by driving the FST5 car.

The Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing such duties, caused the victim to suffer bodily injury, such as light and urine salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. On October 4, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol on blood alcohol concentration of 0.152%, and the Defendant was driving at approximately 5 km from the fedbbbed front of the south-gu Southern-gu in Gwangju to the front of the D farm located in Seo-gu, Gwangju-gu to the front of the D farm located in Gwangju-gu.

As a result, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act, even though he/she violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding E;

1. The fact-finding report, the fact-finding report, the fact-finding report, the fact-finding report, the fact-finding report, and the fact-finding report; and