2. The circumstances are recognized, such as the fact that the Defendant is fully aware of and against the commission of the crime, the total amount of damage is about KRW 17,00,000,000, and it is difficult to reach an agreement with the victim C, and the Defendant raises a child.

However, the crime of this case is committed by deceiving the defendant to sell the vehicle owned by the victim C by deceiving the defendant to sell the vehicle owned by the victim E, by receiving the purchase price from the victim E by deceiving the purchase of the vehicle. It is not yet agreed with E, which is the victim of the same kind of crime. The defendant committed each crime of this case again even though he was in the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case at a disadvantage of the defendant. The defendant was committed again under normal circumstances, such as motive, method and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, age, environment, occupation, etc. of this case, and all the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case, and the sentencing guidelines range of the recommendations in the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court, and the aggravated area (crime against victim E) [one to two years and six months] [Special Crime No. 1 (100 million won)] [The sentencing range of imprisonment with prison labor for the victim of the same repeated crime of less than 100 million won].

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition

Provided, That on November 16, 2014, the execution of the sentence was completed in accordance with Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.

"...."