2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant shows an attitude against his or her will while taking part in his or her mistake, and that the crime of this case appears to have arisen from the defendant's living difficulties.

However, in light of the contents of the crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of the crimes, the period of the crimes, and the scale of the amount of damage, etc., the crime of this case was committed by the victim by intrusion upon each other’s residence, which did not have any gap in the other’s residence, and thus, the victim’s money and valuables were stolen.

The crime of this case also constitutes a repeated crime due to the same criminal record, and its possibility of criticism is more and more high.

In light of the defendant's living environment and social ties, the risk of recidivism is also high.

Considering the above circumstances favorable or unfavorable to the defendant, and the age, sex, environment, and all other conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.