However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The name and the poor, who is the general responsibility of the fraudulent Telecommunications-based Financial Fraud (hereinafter referred to as “scam”) organization, shall organize various steps, such as deceptions, management measures, and cash withdrawal measures. The officers of the deceptions make false statements to the majority of unspecified individuals that they would make loans by misrepresenting themselves to the employees of financial institutions by misrepresenting them at a low interest rate, and make them deposit money to the large account linked to the check card collected in advance in terms of the repayment of existing loans, etc., and the researchers belonging to the management measures have the victims deposit money into the check account linked to the check card collected in advance in terms of the repayment of existing loans. The researchers who received the account information to be used for committing the crime by inviting cash withdrawal and receive the account information to be used for committing the crime, and have the amount deposited into the account of cash withdrawal, and have them deposited in order to make the money deposited in another account secured in advance, and commit the crime

On May 2018, the Defendant received a proposal from the Internet to the effect that he/she would be able to receive money by transferring the passbook through the Internet Game “B”, and that he/she would be allowed to receive money from the Defendant’s account by searching for “transfer of the passbook” on the Internet, and allowing him/her to use the account at the sports competition, etc.., and then C consented to the defect that “I would first use the account when he/she deposits money. I would like to find it possible for us to first use the means of access to the Defendant’s account (e.g., physical card,OTP card, password, etc.) if he/she had a means of access separate from the Defendant’s account and received money from the Defendant’s account.”

On May 28, 2018, the victim D-related Bophishing deception, made a false statement to the effect that “a loan can be made at a low interest rate if an existing loan is repaid” by misrepresenting the victim D by phoneing the victim D at an unsound place.