2. The judgment of the defendant reflects the mistake while making a confession of the crime of this case, and the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim is considered favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is found to have discovered F where the victim was assaulted by the victim B, and the victim reported the defect in 119 to the police, thereby committing an assaulting 4 weeks by causing the victim's face while driving away from the victim by drinking, etc. In light of the method, contents, circumstances, degree of injury, etc. of the crime, the crime is very serious; the defendant committed the crime of this case during the suspension period of execution due to multiple times of criminal punishment due to the crime of violence; the defendant committed the crime of this case during the suspension period of execution due to the defendant's age, sexual behavior, family environment, etc.; and all of the sentencing conditions in the argument of this case including the defendant's age, family environment, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.