When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendants are between the military forces and the farite-gu.

1. On January 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 08:40, at a D restaurant located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) at women’s problem, the Defendant collected plastics from the victim; (c) boomed the victim’s breath, boomed the victim’s breath; and (d) boomed the victim’s face on the floor; and (c) boomed the victim’s face by drinking breath; and (d) boomed the victim’s 7-day medical treatment for approximately seven days.

2. Defendant B, at the same time, at a place as set forth in paragraph (1) and at the same time and place, for the foregoing reasons, she saw the Defendant as a router by cutting the Defendant’s trees over the floor, and erer’s face, which is a dangerous object on the remainder of the floor in which the rupture was made, followed the victim by taking about four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the occurrence report (fence), investigation report report (A), diagnosis report (B), photographs of injury (B), CCTV images, CCTV images, and CCTV images CDs;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Defendant A who choose a fine for a crime; Articles 258-2(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B who is to be mitigated: Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A with a provisional payment order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. The circumstances unfavorable to Defendant A: (a) without being aware of the period of suspension of execution (the period of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on May 31, 2016, which was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on June 8, 2016; and (b) the judgment became final and conclusive on June 8, 2016). The circumstances favorable to the Defendant are not relatively serious: contingent crimes; (c) the victim is not subject to punishment; (d) the victim’