If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who drives BCA100 V Meba.

On November 17, 2015, the Defendant driven the upper 22:40 on the upper west and proceeded at a speed of the speed of the next 5 complex distance in the direction of the post office.

Since a signal light and crosswalk is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce the speed of the person engaged in driving service, to take the front door and the left door well, to observe the signal, and to check whether there is a person to walk the crosswalk, and to safely drive the crosswalk.

Nevertheless, even though the Defendant neglected this and neglected to report the signal, etc. installed on the right side, the Defendant received the part of the victim C’s left side part of the pedestrian crossing in the front direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, which walked on the green signal, from the front side of the Defendant’s proceeding.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered approximately two weeks of medical care due to occupational negligence as above from the victim’s abstinence, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s traffic accident statement;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Field photographs, etc.;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (investigation into the signal cycle);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.